In practice

Storing gold and silver

Home, an allocated vault, or an unallocated claim — different facts about access, cost, and counterparty.

Metal that has already been poured or struck still has to sit somewhere. Home, an allocated vault, and an unallocated claim are not grades of one product. They are different answers to who can reach the object, what it costs to leave it there, and whose failure stands between the holder and the metal.

Access, cost, and counterparty

Home access is immediate: the metal is in a room the household already occupies. Vault access is scheduled — hours, identification, a release. A line on a statement has no object to reach until someone delivers one.

Home storage has no vault invoice. It still has a lock, a place, and the work of keeping both quiet. A vault invoices for space, insurance, and handling. An unallocated or pool account often invoices less, because the operator is not setting aside a named bar for each name. A lower fee is a different product.

At home the counterparty is the household: fire, theft, a forgotten combination, a safe that advertises itself. In a vault it is the operator, the insurer, and the law of the place. On an unallocated book it is the claim itself — a promise to deliver metal, not a named pile.

Home

Home keeps the metal in the household’s control. There is no vault fee and no auditor. The operational risk sits with the object: fire, flood, theft, a move that leaves a drawer behind, a combination nobody else can recover. A visible safe is also a sign. A hiding place no one else can find is a place no one else can recover.

Household insurance, where it exists for metal, is a contract with limits. Neighbours, visitors, and repair people change who knows the house. Those are the practical household risks that come with control.

Allocated and unallocated

Allocated storage, as the bullion trade uses the word, identifies specific bars or coins as belonging to a named holder. The metal is segregated. A bar list, a serial, a weight, a fineness, and a vault location should be nameable. Identifiable bars and coins are the test. If the paperwork cannot name the pieces, “allocated” is only a label.

Unallocated storage, and the pool accounts that work the same way, is a claim on a stack. The operator owes metal of a published specification and does not set aside a named bar. The book is easier to run — ounces in, ounces out — and easier to confuse with a bank deposit. If you cannot point to a bar list, you have a claim, not a stack.

A statement that says “allocated” and then lists only a weight is a claim with a flattering adjective. Pooled metal can sit in a real vault and still not be anyone’s identifiable pile.

Documentation and segregation

An allocated arrangement should say whose name is on the metal, where it sits, how it is identified, and what happens if the operator fails. Serials, bar lists, and a statement of segregation make the claim inspectable. They do not make the metal safer.

Segregation means the objects are not mixed into the operator’s inventory and not treated as a loan the operator can re-pledge at will. The contract either says that or it does not. Jurisdiction, the custodian, and the limits of any insurance are part of the same counterparty.

The object and the place

A large wholesale bar is dense and awkward to move. A vault that handles bars by serial is built for that density. A common bullion coin is easier to recognise in a drawer and easier to carry in ones. Small minted bars sit between those poles. Fabrication, premium, and resale friction are compared on gold bars vs coins. The form you hold and the place it sits are one decision.

A coin that paid more fabrication per ounce does not become a different metal at home. A bar with a smaller gap to spot does not become allocated because someone said the word. A seller who will “store it for you” and never ship has only moved the custody question into another costume.